Re: Relation extension scalability

From: Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Relation extension scalability
Date: 2016-03-28 21:51:34
Message-ID: 56F9A766.3000504@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 28/03/16 14:46, Dilip Kumar wrote:
>
> Conclusion:
> ---------------
> 1. I think v15 is solving the problem exist with v13 and performance
> is significantly high compared to base, and relation size is also
> stable, So IMHO V15 is winner over other solution, what other thinks ?
>

It seems so, do you have ability to reasonably test with 64 clients? I
am mostly wondering if we see the performance going further down or just
plateau.

--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-03-28 22:14:57 Re: BRIN is missing in multicolumn indexes documentation
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-03-28 21:19:36 pgsql: Sync tzload() and tzparse() APIs with IANA release tzcode2016c.