Re: Table size for partitioned setup

From: Rob Sargent <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Table size for partitioned setup
Date: 2016-03-28 20:49:21
Message-ID: 56F998D1.6090906@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 03/28/2016 02:41 PM, Mat Arye wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am writing a program that needs time-series-based insert mostly
> workload. I need to make the system scaleable with many thousand of
> inserts/s. One of the techniques I plan to use is time-based table
> partitioning and I am trying to figure out how large to make my time
> tables.
>
> Does anybody have any hints on optimal table sizes either in terms of
> rows or in terms of size? Any rule of thumbs I can use for table size
> in relation to amount of memory on the machine? Is the size of the
> index more important than the size of the table (if queries mostly use
> indexes)?
>
> Basically, I am asking for pointers about how to think about this
> problem and any experiences people have had.
>
> Thanks,
> Mat
>
> P.S. I am aware of limits listed here:
> http://www.postgresql.org/about/. I am asking about practical size
> limits for performance consideration.
Your current hardware, or hardware budget might play into the answer.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mat Arye 2016-03-28 20:55:38 Re: Table size for partitioned setup
Previous Message Mat Arye 2016-03-28 20:41:00 Table size for partitioned setup