Re: unexpected result from to_tsvector

On 25.03.2016 19:15, David Steele wrote:
> On 3/25/16 12:14 PM, Artur Zakirov wrote:
>> On 25.03.2016 18:19, David Steele wrote:
>>> Hi Artur,
>>>
>>> On 3/20/16 10:42 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> "Shulgin, Oleksandr" <oleksandr(dot)shulgin(at)zalando(dot)de> writes:
>>>>> On Mar 20, 2016 01:09, "Dmitrii Golub" <dmitrii(dot)golub(at)gmail(dot)com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Alex, actually subdomain can start with digit,
>>>>
>>>>> Not according to the RFC you have linked to.
>>>>
>>>> The powers-that-be relaxed that some time ago; I assume there's a newer
>>>> RFC. For instance, "163.com" is a real domain:
>>>
>>> You marked this patch "needs review" and then a few minutes later
>>> changed it to "waiting on author".
>>>
>>> If this was a mistake please change it back to "needs review". If you
>>> really are working on a new patch when can we expect that?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The previous patch is current, which can be commited.
>>
>> I mark this patch as "needs review", because I noticed that the patch
>> was marked as "waiting on author". And I thought that I forgot to mark
>> as "need review".
>>
>> But then I noticed that Robert Haas marked the patch as "waiting on
>> author" after my answer, and I returned "waiting on author". But I cant
>> find any questions or comments to me after my last answer.
>>
>> Actually I think that this patch should be marked as "need review".
>
> Done.
>

Thank you!

--
Artur Zakirov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company