Re: NOT EXIST for PREPARE

From: Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Yury Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: NOT EXIST for PREPARE
Date: 2016-03-24 22:32:42
Message-ID: 56F46B0A.6060309@proxel.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 03/24/2016 11:21 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>> Personally I think the right solution would be to add support for prepared
>> statements in pgbouncer, and have pgbouncer run PREPARE as necessary, either
>> after opening a new connection to the database or at the first use of a
>> given prepared statement in a connection.
>
> maybe so. A while back I was running a hacked pgbouncer that had
> support for async notifications (i still have the code around
> somewhere). It can be done -- however this not a complete solution;
> both LISTEN and PREPARE are possible from within server-side
> functions.

Yes, it is not a complete solution, but it solves the problems of many
users. I think even just supporting the protocol level prepare and
execute commands would be enough for many of those who have problems
with pgbouncer.

Andreas

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2016-03-24 22:38:18 Re: Using quicksort for every external sort run
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2016-03-24 22:21:14 Re: NOT EXIST for PREPARE