| From: | Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |
| Date: | 2016-03-22 17:41:42 |
| Message-ID: | 56F183D6.5070403@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 03/22/2016 10:18 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:.
>
> Most of that was committed *after* our discussion. It's definitely a
> very solid release now. (and I agree that was a somewhat weird feature
> credit in 9.4,but hey, we also got most of our json publicity for the
> one in 9.2, not the really useful one in 9.4. Our track record with
> these things isn't really the best..).
It's important to remember that PR strategy and engineering truth have
only a passing acquaintance. While we don't want to promote vaporware,
we do sometimes soft-pedal our own features to our project's detriment.
In the current atomosphere of VC-funded hype, we'd do a bit better to
trumpet our accomplishements early and often.
Not that that has any effect on 10.0 vs. 9.6.
--
--
Josh Berkus
Red Hat OSAS
(any opinions are my own)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2016-03-22 17:52:26 | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-03-22 17:38:50 | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |