| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, pgsql-advocacy(at)PostgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |
| Date: | 2016-03-22 17:15:11 |
| Message-ID: | 56F17D9F.2030306@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 03/22/2016 10:11 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> I think there was talk of breaking pg_upgrade duringr an increase in the
> first digit, but as you stated, there isn't any technical demand for
> that.
>
I don't see a reason for the 10.x jump. If PgLogical and/or BDR had been
ready, then absolutely. Although the parallel query is certainly of
importance, I don't know if it is any more important than the
scalability fixes we got in 9.5.x.
Sincerely,
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2016-03-22 17:18:16 | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2016-03-22 17:11:04 | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |