Re: pam auth - add rhost item

From: Grzegorz Sampolski <grzsmp(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pam auth - add rhost item
Date: 2016-03-21 09:59:20
Message-ID: 56EFC5F8.2030602@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Ok. So if no one objected to the evening - in my time zone ofcourse :)
I will change pamusedns to pam_use_hostname.

On 03/21/2016 08:43 AM, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:46 PM, Grzegorz Sampolski <grzsmp(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Hi.
>> Can be, but as you mentioned OS resolver can be configured to not use
>> dns at all. So much more appropriate will be pam_try_hostname if we want
>> to be more accurately.
>> But for me pamusedns, pam_use_hostname or pam_try_hostname all are
>> correct as either need to use some try to resolve ip address
>> irrespectively OS resolver use dns or not - I mean getnameinfo() not
>> give you such information if OS resolver use dns or not.
>> No to drug the discussion I can change pamusedns to pam_use_hostname if
>> you prefer.
>
> +1 for pam_use_hostname.
>
>
> Regards,
> Hari Babu
> Fujitsu Australia
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2016-03-21 10:04:33 Re: dealing with extension dependencies that aren't quite 'e'
Previous Message Andres Freund 2016-03-21 09:35:34 latch usage and postmaster death