Re: MinGW versus _strtoui64() ?

From: Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: MinGW versus _strtoui64() ?
Date: 2016-03-13 03:13:39
Message-ID: 56E4DAE3.7070304@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 13/03/16 03:30, Tom Lane wrote:
> Per a comment from Petr Jelinek, I added this in commit 23a27b039d94ba35:
>
> #ifdef WIN32
> return _strtoui64(str, endptr, base);
> #else ...
>
> Several of the Windows buildfarm members are good with that, but
> narwhal is not:
>
> numutils.c: In function `pg_strtouint64':
> numutils.c:406: warning: implicit declaration of function `_strtoui64'
> ...
> Creating library file: libpostgres.a
> utils/adt/numutils.o(.text+0x67b): In function `pg_strtouint64':
> C:/msys/1.0/local/pgbuildfarm/buildroot/HEAD/pgsql.build/src/backend/utils/adt/numutils.c:406: undefined reference to `_strtoui64'
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>

Looks like it has to be limited to MSVC not WIN32, mingw does not have it.

--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-03-13 03:24:38 Re: MinGW versus _strtoui64() ?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-03-13 02:41:34 Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification