| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas(at)visena(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Exclude pg_largeobject form pg_dump |
| Date: | 2016-03-08 16:38:04 |
| Message-ID: | 56DEFFEC.9040205@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On 03/08/2016 08:02 AM, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
> På tirsdag 08. mars 2016 kl. 16:57:01, skrev Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
> <mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>>:
>
> Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas(at)visena(dot)com> writes:
> > What I'm looking for is "inverse -b" in an otherwise complete
> dump. Any plans
> > to add that?
>
> [ shrug... ] Nobody ever asked for it before.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> It surely helps testing production-datasets which contain lots of BLOBs
> where one wants to dump the production-data into a test-env. We have
> >1TB databases containing > 95% blobs so it would help us tremendously
> to have this option.
I have quite a few customers that would benefit from the ability to not
have blobs present in dumps.
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Joseph Krogh | 2016-03-08 16:45:14 | Re: Exclude pg_largeobject form pg_dump |
| Previous Message | Jan de Visser | 2016-03-08 16:29:57 | Re: Does a call to a language handler provide a context/session, and somewhere to keep session data? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Joseph Krogh | 2016-03-08 16:45:14 | Re: Exclude pg_largeobject form pg_dump |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2016-03-08 16:31:21 | Re: Odd warning from pg_dump |