Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker.

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, pokurev(at)pm(dot)nttdata(dot)co(dot)jp, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, bannos(at)nttdata(dot)co(dot)jp
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker.
Date: 2016-03-07 10:18:16
Message-ID: 56DD5568.5070902@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016/03/07 19:11, Amit Langote wrote:
> we should re-introduce[1] a fixed-size char st_progress_message[] field.

Sorry, that [1] does not refer to anything, just a leftover from my draft.
I thought I had a link handy for an email where some sort of
justification was given as to why st_progress_message field was removed
from the patch. I couldn't find it.

Thanks,
Amit

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-03-07 10:28:55 Re: Greeting for coming back, and where is PostgreSQL going
Previous Message Amit Langote 2016-03-07 10:11:03 Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker.