Re: JPUG wants to have a copyright notice on the translated doc

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: JPUG wants to have a copyright notice on the translated doc
Date: 2016-03-05 02:05:06
Message-ID: 56DA3ED2.8040308@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 03/04/2016 06:01 PM, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:

>> Considering they are BSD licensed, I am not sure what abuses could be
>> taken?
>
> I imagine kind of an extream case: a bad guy removes "Copyright
> 1996-2016 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group" and replaces it
> with his/her copyright.

Right but again, what happens when they do that? In a practical sense,
nothing because we are BSD licensed.

In short, no worries, 100% happy that JPUG is taking initiative.

Sincerely,

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Regina Obe 2016-03-05 02:29:28 Is there a way around function search_path killing SQL function inlining?
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2016-03-05 02:01:54 Re: JPUG wants to have a copyright notice on the translated doc