From: | Julien Rouhaud <julien(dot)rouhaud(at)dalibo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com |
Cc: | michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com, fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com, guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Publish autovacuum informations |
Date: | 2016-03-04 21:52:03 |
Message-ID: | 56DA0383.2090108@dalibo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/03/2016 10:54, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> Hello,
>
> At Wed, 2 Mar 2016 17:48:06 -0600, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com> wrote in <56D77BB6(dot)6080606(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>
>> On 3/2/16 10:48 AM, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
>>> Good point, I don't see a lot of information available with this hooks
>>> that a native system statistics couldn't offer. To have the same
>>> amount
>>> of information, I think we'd need a pg_stat_autovacuum view that shows
>>> a
>>> realtime insight of the workers, and also add some aggregated counters
>>> to PgStat_StatTabEntry. I wonder if adding counters to
>>> PgStat_StatTabEntry would be accepted though.
>>
>> I would also really like to see a means of logging (auto)vacuum
>> activity in the database itself. We figured out how to do that with
>> pg_stat_statements, which was a lot harder... it seems kinda silly not
>> to offer that for vacuum. Hooks plus shared memory data should allow
>> for that (the only tricky bit is the hook would need to start and then
>> commit a transaction, but that doesn't seem onerous).
>>
>> I think the shared memory structures should be done as well. Having
>> that real-time info is also valuable.
>>
>> I don't see too much point in adding stuff to the stats system for
>> this.
>
> I wonder why there haven't been discussions so far on what kind
> of information we want by this feature. For example I'd be happy
> to see the time of last autovacuum trial and the cause if it has
> been skipped for every table. Such information would (maybe)
> naturally be shown in pg_stat_*_tables.
>
> =====
> =# select relid, last_completed_autovacuum, last_completed_autovacv_status, last_autovacuum_trial, last_autovacuum_result from pg_stat_user_tables;
> -[ RECORD 1 ]-----------------+------
> relid | 16390
> last_completed_autovacuum | 2016-03-01 01:25:00.349074+09
> last_completed_autovac_status | Completed in 4 seconds. Scanned 434 pages, skipped 23 pages
> last_autovacuum_trial | 2016-03-03 17:33:04.004322+09
> last_autovac_traial_status | Canceled by PID 2355. Processed 144/553 pages.
> -[ RECORD 2 ]----------+------
> ...
> last_autovacuum_trial | 2016-03-03 07:25:00.349074+09
> last_autovac_traial_status | Completed in 4 seconds. Scanned 434 pages, skipped 23 pages
> -[ RECORD 3 ]----------+------
> ...
> last_autovacuum_trial | 2016-03-03 17:59:12.324454+09
> last_autovac_trial_status | Processing by PID 42334, 564 / 32526 pages done.
> -[ RECORD 4 ]----------+------
> ...
> last_autovacuum_trial | 2016-03-03 17:59:12.324454+09
> last_autovac_trial_status | Skipped by dead-tuple threashold.
> =====
>
> Apart from the appropriateness of the concrete shape, it would be
> done by extending the current stats system and needs modification
> of some other parts but the hooks and WorkerInfoData is not
> enough. This might be a business of Rahila's "VACUUM Progress
> Checker" and it convers some real-time info.
>
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/9/545/
>
> On the other hand, it would be in another place and needs another
> method if we want a history like the current autovacuum
> completion logs (at debug3..) of 100 latest invocation of
> autovacuum worker. Anyway the WorkerInfoData is not enough.
>
>
> What kind of information we (will) want to have?
>
Very good suggestion.
I think the most productive way to work on this is to start a wiki page
to summarize what's the available information, what we should store and
how to represent it.
I'll update this thread as soon as I'll have a first draft finished.
>
> regards,
>
--
Julien Rouhaud
http://dalibo.com - http://dalibo.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-03-04 22:11:16 | Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker. |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2016-03-04 21:43:01 | Re: Performance improvement for joins where outer side is unique |