| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_basebackup compression TODO item |
| Date: | 2016-03-03 17:36:19 |
| Message-ID: | 56D87613.1030902@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/03/2016 09:23 AM, Jeff Janes wrote:
> Since SSL compression seems to be a busted flush, I would like to see
> pg_basebackup be able to do compression on the server end, not just
> the client end, in order to spare network bandwidth.
>
> Any comments on how hard this would be, or why we don't want it?
We want it and we want it over multiple workers.
JD
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jeff
>
>
--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Dilger | 2016-03-03 17:40:04 | Re: improving GROUP BY estimation |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2016-03-03 17:34:43 | Re: pg_basebackup compression TODO item |