From: | Leonardo M(dot) Ramé <l(dot)rame(at)griensu(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | s d <daku(dot)sandor(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Update foreign table with trigger |
Date: | 2016-02-26 19:19:10 |
Message-ID: | 56D0A52E.7070802@griensu.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
El 26/02/16 a las 16:18, s d escribió:
>
> On 26 February 2016 at 20:02, Leonardo M. Ramé <l(dot)rame(at)griensu(dot)com
> <mailto:l(dot)rame(at)griensu(dot)com>> wrote:
>
>
> El 26/02/16 a las 15:55, John R Pierce escribió:
>
> On 2/26/2016 10:29 AM, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
>
> Hi, I created a Postgres_FDW table (TABLE_A) and need to do
> an update on that table.
>
> As TABLE_A has a trigger, and the trigger does an insert on
> another table (TABLE_B), I had to create another foreign
> table called TABLE_B, that's ok.
>
>
>
> that trigger is defined on the server that actually has table_a,
> right? or did you define a trigger on the FDW table ?
>
> Hi John, yes, the trigger is only defined on the foreign server.
>
>
> Let's check we get this right!
> You have two "real" table in the remote server with a trigger doing it's
> job on them and on the local server you have and FDW on each remote
> table. Right?
>
Yes, that's right.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | s d | 2016-02-26 19:33:17 | Re: Update foreign table with trigger |
Previous Message | s d | 2016-02-26 19:18:02 | Re: Update foreign table with trigger |