From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-committers <pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Michael Paquier |
Date: | 2016-02-08 21:50:42 |
Message-ID: | 56B90DB2.4050805@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
On 02/08/2016 04:47 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>> This came up today in connection with buildfarm database access. My policy
>> (before the server move) has been that access is granted to committers who
>> are also on the -security list. However, Michael is not a committer, and has
>> requested access.
>>
>> I've actually thought for some time that there is plenty of reason to give
>> him a commit bit, so at Stephen's suggestion I'm raising that question. He's
>> done plenty of good work, including on Windows where we still need plenty of
>> help from time to time, and managed a commitfest or two, so he seems quite
>> well qualified.
> You have sent this email to the public list rather than the private
> one which you probably intended.
>
I know. *sigh* Multitasking again.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-02-08 23:43:20 | pgsql: Temporarily make pg_ctl and server shutdown a whole lot chattier |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-02-08 21:47:00 | Re: Michael Paquier |