From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: enable parallel query by default? |
Date: | 2016-02-08 21:17:17 |
Message-ID: | 56B905DD.6020707@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 02/08/2016 01:07 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One of the questions I have about parallel query is whether it should
> be enabled by default. That is, should we make the default value of
> max_parallel_degree to a value higher than 0? Perhaps 1, say?
O.k. after some googling where I found your fantastic blog on the
subject, max_parallel_degree looks like it should be
max_parallel_workers. Am I correct in assuming that given the
opportunity to use parallel workers, postgres will launch N number of
workers up to the value of max_parallel_degree ?
If so, then I think 1 or 2 would be reasonable. By far the majority of
servers are going to have at least two cores.
>
> There are some good reasons why this might be a bad idea, such as:
>
> - As discussed on a nearby thread, there is every possibility of nasty bugs.
Which we won't find if it doesn't get turned on.
> - Parallel query uses substantially more resources than a regular
> query, which might overload your system.
How much of a reality is that? Isn't this something we could just cover
in the release notes?
>
> On the other hand:
>
> - Features that are on by default get more testing and thus might get
> less buggy more quickly.
Correct.
> - A lot of people don't change the default configuration and thus
> wouldn't get any benefit from the feature if it's not on by default.
>
Correct.
> Thoughts?
>
+1 on enabling by default.
Sincerely,
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2016-02-08 21:19:20 | Re: 2016-01 Commitfest |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2016-02-08 21:11:48 | Re: a raft of parallelism-related bug fixes |