From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Catalin Iacob <iacobcatalin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, dinesh kumar <dineshkumar02(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c |
Date: | 2016-02-05 01:35:42 |
Message-ID: | 56B3FC6E.8080006@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/29/15 10:38 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 11:10:55AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 12:15 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> should be noted, recorded somewhere so this introduce possible
>>>>> compatibility
>>>>> issue - due default processing .psqlrc.
>>>>
>>>> That's written in the commit log, so I guess that's fine.
>>>
>>> ook
>>
>> Bruce uses the commit log to prepare the release notes, so I guess
>> he'll make mention of this.
>
> Yes, I will certainly see it.
I generally use the master branch psql for normal work, and this change
has caused massive breakage for me. It's straightforward to fix, but in
some cases the breakage is silent, for example if you do
something=$(psql -c ...) and the .psqlrc processing causes additional
output. I'm not sure what to make of it yet, but I want to mention it,
because I fear there will be heartache.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Noah Misch | 2016-02-05 02:44:19 | Re: pgcommitfest reply having corrupted subject line |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2016-02-05 00:31:59 | Re: "using previous checkpoint record at" maybe not the greatest idea? |