| From: | Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Shubham Barai <shubhambaraiss(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: UNIQUE capability to hash indexes |
| Date: | 2016-02-04 23:22:50 |
| Message-ID: | 56B3DD4A.3040507@proxel.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 02/04/2016 11:34 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> This is really strange though. Surely adding WAL-logging is not an
>> enormous task anymore ... I mean, we're undertaking far larger efforts
>> now, the WAL logging code is simpler than before, and we even have a
>> tool (ok, gotta streamline that one a little bit) to verify that the
>> results are correct.
>
> ISTR that we discussed this previously and ran into some stumbling block
> or other that made it less-than-trivial. Don't recall what though.
The last discussion I can recall was Robert's ideas on how to solve the
splitting of buckets.
Andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Antonin Houska | 2016-02-04 23:42:53 | Re: UNIQUE capability to hash indexes |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2016-02-04 23:10:33 | Re: insufficient qualification of some objects in dump files |