| From: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | curtis(dot)ruck(at)gmail(dot)com, José Luis Tallón <jltallon(at)adv-solutions(dot)net>, Curtis Ruck <curtis(dot)ruck+pgsql(dot)hackers(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL Auditing |
| Date: | 2016-02-02 22:16:38 |
| Message-ID: | 56B12AC6.4060709@pgmasters.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/2/16 4:50 PM, Michael Banck wrote:
>
> We are looking into packaging pgaudit for Debian.
>
> However, then another question comes up: Should the 2nd Quadrant or the
> Crunchy Data codebase be added to the distribution? Who gets to decide?
For my 2 cents I think that the version I submitted recently is better
for PostgreSQL >= 9.5:
https://github.com/pgaudit/pgaudit
For this version I started with 2ndQuadrant's excellent work then spent
months refactoring, testing and adding additional configuration options.
In addition a number of reviewers found issues which were fixed and in
general it went through a trial by fire. This version includes more
comprehensive documentation and extensive regression tests.
However, the original 2ndQuadrant version will happily work with
PostgreSQL 9.3 or 9.4:
https://github.com/2ndQuadrant/pgaudit
> Alternatively, both could be added, but that will likely confuse users.
This sort of confusion is one of the main reasons I pursued inclusion in
core.
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-02-02 22:18:09 | Re: [POC] FETCH limited by bytes. |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-02-02 22:15:55 | Re: proposal: PL/Pythonu - function ereport |