| From: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Add generate_series(date, date) and generate_series(date, date, integer) |
| Date: | 2016-02-02 18:08:16 |
| Message-ID: | 56B0F090.1020705@pgmasters.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/2/16 1:01 PM, Corey Huinker wrote:
> Doh, I left that comment to myself in there. :)
If I had a dime for every time I've done that...
> The corresponding structs in timestamp.c and int.c have no comment, so
> suggestions of what should be there are welcome. In the interim I put in
> this:
>
> /* state for generate_series_date(date,date,[step]) */
I think that's fine -- whoever commits it may feel otherwise.
> Do you have any insight as to why the documentation test failed?
>
> In the mean time, here's the updated patch.
I didn't pass the docs on account of the wonky comment since I consider
code comments to be part of the docs. The sgml docs build fine and look
good to me.
I'll retest and update the review accordingly.
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Corey Huinker | 2016-02-02 18:20:01 | Re: Re: Add generate_series(date, date) and generate_series(date, date, integer) |
| Previous Message | Corey Huinker | 2016-02-02 18:01:22 | Re: Re: Add generate_series(date, date) and generate_series(date, date, integer) |