Re: PostgreSQL Audit Extension

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Audit Extension
Date: 2016-02-02 06:34:26
Message-ID: 56B04DF2.2050308@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 02/01/2016 08:23 PM, Robert Haas wrote:

> It also appears to me that if we did want to do that, it would need
> quite a lot of additional cleanup. I haven't dug in enough to have a
> list of specific issues, but it does look to me like there would be
> quite a bit. Maybe that'd be worth doing if there were other
> advantages of having this be in core, but I don't see them.
>

Thus... it is a great extension and doesn't need to be in core.

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kouhei Kaigai 2016-02-02 06:55:47 Re: Way to check whether a particular block is on the shared_buffer?
Previous Message Catalin Iacob 2016-02-02 06:30:24 Re: proposal: PL/Pythonu - function ereport