From: | Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: postgres_fdw join pushdown (was Re: Custom/Foreign-Join-APIs) |
Date: | 2016-01-29 08:35:12 |
Message-ID: | 56AB2440.4070505@lab.ntt.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2016/01/29 1:26, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> Here's an updated version of the previous patches, broken up like before
> 2. pg_fdw_join_v3.patch: changes to postgres_fdw - more description below
> Here is the summary of changes from the last set of patches
> 2. Included fix for EvalPlanQual in postgres_fdw - an alternate local
> path is obtained from the list of paths linked to the joinrel. Since
> this is done before adding the ForeignPath, we should be a local path
> available for given join.
I looked at that code in the patch (ie, postgresRecheckForeignScan and
the helper function that creates a local join path for a given foreign
join path.), briefly. Maybe I'm missing something, but I think that is
basically the same as the fix I proposed for addressing this issue,
posted before [1], right? If so, my concern is, the helper function
probably wouldn't extend to the parameterized-foreign-join-path cases,
though that would work well for the unparameterized-foreign-join-path
cases. We don't support parameterized-foreign-join paths for 9.6?
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
[1] http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/5666B59F.6010701@lab.ntt.co.jp
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2016-01-29 08:46:51 | Re: postgres_fdw join pushdown (was Re: Custom/Foreign-Join-APIs) |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2016-01-29 08:13:30 | Re: Re: BUG #13685: Archiving while idle every archive_timeout with wal_level hot_standby |