From: | Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: remove wal_level archive |
Date: | 2016-01-26 18:37:51 |
Message-ID: | 56A7BCFF.6060008@timbira.com.br |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 26-01-2016 12:56, Simon Riggs wrote:
> Removing one of "archive" or "hot standby" will just cause confusion and
> breakage, so neither is a good choice for removal.
>
Agree.
> What we should do is
> 1. Map "archive" and "hot_standby" to one level with a new name that
> indicates that it can be used for both/either backup or replication.
> (My suggested name for the new level is "replica"...)
> 2. Deprecate "archive" and "hot_standby" so that those will be removed
> in a later release.
>
3. Add a WARNING at startup (until removal of values) saying something
like "'archive' value is deprecated and will be removed in a future
version. Use 'replica' value instead."
--
Euler Taveira Timbira - http://www.timbira.com.br/
PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Corey Huinker | 2016-01-26 19:07:55 | Re: Add generate_series(date, date) and generate_series(date, date, integer) |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2016-01-26 18:26:26 | Re: Add generate_series(date,date) and generate_series(date,date,integer) |