| From: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | vinpokale(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker. |
| Date: | 2016-01-26 00:51:35 |
| Message-ID: | 56A6C317.2020007@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Vinayak,
On 2016/01/25 20:58, Vinayak Pokale wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please find attached updated patch with an updated interface.
>
Thanks for updating the patch.
> I added the below interface to update the
> scanned_heap_pages,scanned_index_pages and index_scan_count only.
> void pgstat_report_progress_scanned_pages(int num_of_int, uint32
> *progress_scanned_pages_param)
I think it's still the same interface with the names changed. IIRC, what
was suggested was to provide a way to not have to pass the entire array
for the update of a single member of it. Just pass the index of the
updated member and its new value. Maybe, something like:
void pgstat_progress_update_counter(int index, uint32 newval);
The above function would presumably update the value of
beentry.st_progress_counter[index] or something like that.
Thanks,
Amit
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-01-26 01:00:36 | Re: why pg_size_pretty is volatile? |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-01-26 00:35:56 | Re: File based Incremental backup v8 |