Re: CoC [Final v2]

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com>, S McGraw <smcg4191(at)mtneva(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CoC [Final v2]
Date: 2016-01-24 17:34:05
Message-ID: 56A50B0D.9090903@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 01/24/2016 08:13 AM, Chris Travers wrote:

> If I could make one proposal for an additional clause:
>
> * PostgreSQL is a community project and takes no position on any
> political question aside from its usage in the public sector (which we
> support). We expect communication in community fora to respect this
> need. The community is neither competent nor interested in resolving
> more general social or political questions.

That won't work. The community does take positions. A good example is
when -core denounced the topless dancers at the Russian conference. That
position was taken without consideration that at a lot of this community
doesn't care, won't care, or agrees with the right for the Russian
conference to have those dancers. It was done so because -core wants all
people to feel welcome.

Sincerely,

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Geoff Winkless 2016-01-24 17:39:33 Re: CoC [Final v2]
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2016-01-24 17:30:44 Re: CoC [Final v2]