From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, "Psql_General (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: CoC [Final v2] |
Date: | 2016-01-24 17:26:16 |
Message-ID: | 56A50938.8030400@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 01/24/2016 02:34 AM, Chris Travers wrote:
> We need to also cover abuse by members of the community made
> outside the community. Otherwise we’ll appear to give safe
> harbor to abusers.
>
>
> The private lives of members are the private lives of members. Let
> whatever space they are in and the requirements of that space
> dictate the response to their behaviour.
>
>
> Additionally, "if you are harassed, maybe you should consult a lawyer"
> is not a bad option.
I think that would be covered under support documents. Certainly we
could have a page that has lots of discussion points about things people
can do under these circumstances, but that doesn't belong in the CoC proper.
> This statement can be used in defense of abusive behavior (“I
> was just expressing an opposing view!”).
>
>
> Can you provide an example of said behaviour that does not also
> violate the below?
>
>
> What is abusive? And doesn't any formulation provide cover for arguably
> abusive behavior?
It is rather impossible to be abusive and have it not be a personal
attack or use of disparaging words.
> * Participants must ensure that their language and actions
> are free
> of personal attacks and disparaging personal remarks.
Sincerely,
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2016-01-24 17:30:44 | Re: CoC [Final v2] |
Previous Message | Chris Travers | 2016-01-24 16:13:06 | Re: CoC [Final v2] |