Re: A motion

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Berend Tober <btober(at)computer(dot)org>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A motion
Date: 2016-01-23 23:42:03
Message-ID: 56A40FCB.1090605@aklaver.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 01/23/2016 03:31 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On 01/23/2016 03:08 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
>> On 01/23/2016 03:03 PM, Berend Tober wrote:
>>> Adrian Klaver wrote:
>>>> Motion:
>>>>
>>>> The Coc discussion be moved to its own list where those who care can
>>>> argue to their hearts content and leave the rest of us to deal with
>>>> technical questions. Upon a decision on said list the result be posted
>>>> to the Postgres web site for consideration.
>>>
>>> Been suggested already, and rejected:
>>>
>>> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/56970135.6060203@computer.org
>>
>> I'm an optimist.
>
> With respect Adrian, that is a motion that never stands a chance. If you
> don't want to read it, set up a filter that sends it right to the round
> file.

Not sure why, there is precedence:

http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/47227E15.6030205@agliodbs.com

>
> JD
>
>>
>
>

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2016-01-23 23:43:11 Re: Let's Do the CoC Right
Previous Message Andres Freund 2016-01-23 23:40:34 Re: A motion