| From: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Releasing in September |
| Date: | 2016-01-22 14:18:45 |
| Message-ID: | 56A23A45.1030009@BlueTreble.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/21/16 2:29 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> I also think there should be some way to give credit to CFM, if it is
> difficult to do anything related to money, then we can enforce that if
> CFM submits any patches for next CF, then those should be prioritised.
Personally, I don't see why we have our scarcest resource doing what is
essentially a project management task, especially when at least one
commercial company has offered to donate paid staff time.
I don't think the last CF of 9.6 is the time to experiment, but I think
we should try using a PM for the first CF of 9.7.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2016-01-22 14:40:28 | Re: Releasing in September |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2016-01-22 13:54:12 | Re: Declarative partitioning |