Re: Releasing in September

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Releasing in September
Date: 2016-01-20 17:15:01
Message-ID: 569FC095.1040905@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 01/20/2016 09:03 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> If people don't fix the issues in time, there needs to be
> direct pushback, leading to much less stuff getting in next time round.
>

We have been slowly moving to a more dictator based release anyway. It
used to be that we released "when it's done", then we moved to
commitfest, and now we are having yet another discussion on the same
topic of how to manage all of this.

It seems clear that we need to be able to say:

* "Your feature is awesome. Sorry, you are out of time"

Life is hard sometimes, we don't always get what we want.

Sincerely,

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2016-01-20 17:17:42 Re: Releasing in September
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2016-01-20 17:12:15 Re: Releasing in September