| From: | Stéphane Schildknecht <stephane(dot)schildknecht(at)postgres(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: CoC [Final] |
| Date: | 2016-01-18 20:33:14 |
| Message-ID: | 569D4C0A.4030109@postgres.fr |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 18/01/2016 19:36, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On 01/18/2016 10:15 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>> * Participants who disrupt the collaborative space, or participate in a
>>> pattern of behaviour which could be considered harassment will not be
>>> tolerated.
>>
>> Personally, I was comfortable with the rest of it, but this one
>> made me squirm a little. Could we spin that to say that those
>> behaviors will not be tolerated, versus not tolerating the people?
>> Maybe:
>>
>> * Disruption of the collaborative space or any pattern of
>> behaviour which could be considered harassment will not be
>> tolerated.
>
> No argument from me. I think they both service the same gist.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> JD
>
>
>
I would also vote in favour of not tolerating the behaviour. I guess it would
be less open to critics than saying a participant is not tolerated...
--
Stéphane Schildknecht
Contact régional PostgreSQL pour l'Europe francophone
Loxodata - Conseil, expertise et formations
06.17.11.37.42
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | drum.lucas@gmail.com | 2016-01-18 21:37:41 | “Loop” in plpgsql Function - PostgreSQL 9.2 |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2016-01-18 18:57:30 | Re: CoC [Final] |