| From: | Berend Tober <btober(at)computer(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Brian Dunavant <brian(at)omniti(dot)com>, "Psql_General (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WIP: CoC V5, etc., etc., etc., etc., .... |
| Date: | 2016-01-15 00:57:21 |
| Message-ID: | 569843F1.1070001@computer.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On 01/13/2016 06:00 PM, Berend Tober wrote:
>
>> Whether or not it is a foregone conclusion that this community will
>> adopt a CoC, it seems like a mailing list is not the place to do
>> revision control. Can you people start a github project or something to
>> develope your ideas and come back when you have something solid, please.
>> This thread is creating a lot of spam.
>
> The community discussion around this is not spam.
Yes, roger that. Bad choice of words. Surprising I didn't get CoC'd more
severely.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2016-01-15 01:16:10 | Re: Why PG uses nested-loop join when no indexes are available? |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2016-01-14 23:41:54 | PgDay LFNW April 23rd & 24th (can you speak?) |