From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ted Toth <txtoth(at)gmail(dot)com>, Psql_General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: postgres user with password read-only user without? |
Date: | 2016-01-12 17:45:32 |
Message-ID: | 56953BBC.7000106@aklaver.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 01/12/2016 09:41 AM, Ted Toth wrote:
> Is there a way to configure authentication so that some users require
> a password and other users don't?
Yes, see:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/interactive/auth-pg-hba-conf.html
"user
Specifies which database user name(s) this record matches. The
value all specifies that it matches all users. Otherwise, this is either
the name of a specific database user, or a group name preceded by +.
(Recall that there is no real distinction between users and groups in
PostgreSQL; a + mark really means "match any of the roles that are
directly or indirectly members of this role", while a name without a +
mark matches only that specific role.) For this purpose, a superuser is
only considered to be a member of a role if they are explicitly a member
of the role, directly or indirectly, and not just by virtue of being a
superuser. Multiple user names can be supplied by separating them with
commas. A separate file containing user names can be specified by
preceding the file name with @.
"
>
> Ted
>
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2016-01-12 17:47:40 | Re: WIP: CoC |
Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2016-01-12 17:45:12 | Re: postgres user with password read-only user without? |