Re: Offline Tablespaces and Partial Restore

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Offline Tablespaces and Partial Restore
Date: 2016-01-12 13:28:48
Message-ID: 5694FF90.7090706@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 1/12/16 6:02 AM, Pedro França wrote:
> Yea, we are considering doing all the function calls and access to
> tables with dblink and see how bad this would hurt performance. It will
> be tough to explain this to the SQL Server guys.

You should consider using the Postgres FDW
(http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/postgres-fdw.html) It's
a far more elegant solution to the problem of distributed data.

> Maybe there is another approach to deal with this kind of environment?
> Does Postgres only relies on replication for high availability? Maybe an
> extension that I don't know about?

There are a number of logical replication tools (Slony, Bucardo, BDR,
etc.) but I don't see how they would help in this case (because of your
restore requirements).

--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Regina Obe 2016-01-12 13:42:16 Re: Code of Conduct: Is it time?
Previous Message Dev Kumkar 2016-01-12 13:28:35 Re: PostgreSQL upgrade 9.3.4 -> 9.3.10