Re: Question about DROP TABLE

From: Michal Novotny <michal(dot)novotny(at)trustport(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Question about DROP TABLE
Date: 2016-01-12 11:27:53
Message-ID: 5694E339.8010208@trustport.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 01/12/2016 12:20 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2016-01-12 12:17:09 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> 2016-01-12 12:14 GMT+01:00 Michal Novotny <michal(dot)novotny(at)trustport(dot)com>:
>>
>>> Hi Pavel,
>>> thanks for the information. I've been doing more investigation of this
>>> issue and there's autovacuum running on the table however it's
>>> automatically starting even if there is "autovacuum = off" in the
>>> postgresql.conf configuration file.
>>>
>>
>> Real autovacuum is automatically cancelled. It looks like VACUUM started by
>> cron, maybe?
>
> Unless it's an anti-wraparound autovacuum...
>
> Andres
>

Autovacuum is not started by CRON. How should I understand the
"anti-wraparound autovacuum" ?

Thanks,
Michal

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rushabh Lathia 2016-01-12 11:31:22 Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW
Previous Message Vladimir Sitnikov 2016-01-12 11:26:27 Re: Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102