Re: Bug Tracker

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: James Keener <jim(at)jimkeener(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug Tracker
Date: 2016-01-11 19:25:49
Message-ID: 569401BD.20302@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 01/11/2016 11:18 AM, James Keener wrote:
> There was a side thread in the CoC thread about expanding the dev
> community and making it easier for new devs to get involved. I would
> think that a bug tracker, especially one where bugs can be labeled as
> "Newbie Friendly" could go a long way towards that goal.
>
> Additionally, a proper bug tracker would make it easier for future users
> to find resolutions to issues.
>
> Are there any technical reasons that the project doesn't use a bug
> tracker (beyond pgsql-bugs)?

on -hackers there is on an ongoing thread about this [1] but the long
and short is a: It is a culture issue. Warning, the thread has been
going on for almost 4 months.

JD

1.
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAG9n48_CoXd-8+nU6ri=Ht5pUD47JALyfCp=ztmcdoYcUvHLcA@mail.gmail.com

>
> Jim

--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://the.postgres.company/ 503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
If your social views are from the Silicon Valley or The Bay, please
leave them there.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2016-01-11 19:37:43 New hacker item posted
Previous Message James Keener 2016-01-11 19:18:37 Bug Tracker