| From: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Catalin Iacob <iacobcatalin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, YUriy Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! |
| Date: | 2016-01-08 22:27:07 |
| Message-ID: | 569037BB.1040106@BlueTreble.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/8/16 9:07 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Dunno about that. While a CF manager doesn't necessarily have to have
> a commit bit, I think he/she probably does have to be someone who is known
> and respected on the -hackers list. Otherwise, nagging to finish patches
> is likely to be ignored or even counterproductive.
IMHO that touches on the core issue here. JD and anyone else can offer
up all the resources under the sun, but *it's up to the community to
decide to use them*. In this specific case, if the community agrees that
someone that's not a code contributor will be the CFM for a specific CF
then I think it would work fine. Short of that, your observation might
be very accurate.
I feel a bit bad about some of the emails I've sent on this and related
topics because it feels hand-wavy, but I don't know what else to do. I
can promote these ideas that I think will be very helpful, but without a
strong consensus in the community that it's desirable any efforts will
probably fail.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2016-01-08 23:04:34 | Re: [PROPOSAL] Improvements of Hunspell dictionaries support |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2016-01-08 22:14:23 | Re: Fwd: Re: [DOCS] Document Upper Limit for NAMEDATELEN in pgsql 9.5+ |