Re: RAM of Postgres Server

From: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RAM of Postgres Server
Date: 2016-01-08 10:37:24
Message-ID: 568F9164.1080707@hogranch.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 1/7/2016 10:32 PM, Sachin Srivastava wrote:
> We are looking at more like 500-600 connections simultaneously in 1
> day and I want to say we get 10000 to 12000 connections a day per db.

these applications, are they hammering queries, or mostly idle, and just
issuing intermittent queries?

500 queries at the same time will cause serious resource thrashing with
32 cores. if they are mostly idle, you should look at the pgbouncer
style connection pooling model, as Ben suggests

--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sachin Srivastava 2016-01-08 10:42:41 Re: Function error
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2016-01-08 09:58:50 Re: Function error