From: | Jan de Visser <jan(at)de-visser(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Charging for PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2016-01-06 18:30:51 |
Message-ID: | 568D5D5B.1000209@de-visser.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
[offtopic alert]
On 2016-01-06 12:46 PM, James Keener wrote:
> How does one "start a new thread"?
'New Message' in your favourite email client.
'pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org' in the 'To' box.
> I wasn't aware that changing the subject wouldn't be enough. I tried :/
Check the raw source of the message I replied to. There's 'In-Reply-To'
and 'References' headers email clients use to thread messages.
GMail attempts to be smart by threading messages by subject. This is not
only contrary to the spec, but potentially just as inconvenient, if you
have messages with the same subject. I've had gmail thread messages from
years apart because the subject was something like 'Hello'.
> Jim
jan
>
> On January 6, 2016 12:17:54 PM EST, "Stéphane Schildknecht"
> <stephane(dot)schildknecht(at)postgres(dot)fr> wrote:
>
> On 06/01/2016 16:54, James Keener wrote:
>
> As Melvin mentioned, this belongs in a new thread.
>
>
> And as such, it would have been really kind to actually start a new one.
>
> (...)
>
>
> --
> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Navaneethakrishnan Gopal | 2016-01-06 18:36:51 | Re: BUG #13847: WARNING: skipping "pg_toast_" --- cannot vacuum indexes, views, or special system tables VACUUM |
Previous Message | D'Arcy J.M. Cain | 2016-01-06 18:17:22 | Off topic - How to start a new thread |