From: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Regression caused by recent change to initdb? |
Date: | 2016-01-06 09:57:32 |
Message-ID: | 568CE50C.8020008@lab.ntt.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2016/01/06 17:32, Amit Langote wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I stumbled upon a possibly strange behavior which may be related to recent
> initdb changes. For a freshly initdb'd cluster, the following looks fishy:
>
> postgres=# SELECT relname, relnamespace::regnamespace FROM pg_class
> WHERE relnamespace != 'pg_catalog'::regnamespace
> AND relnamespace != 'pg_toast'::regnamespace
> AND relnamespace != 'information_schema'::regnamespace;
> relname | relnamespace
> ----------------------+-----------------
> pg_toast_11817 | pg_toast_temp_1
> pg_toast_11817_index | pg_toast_temp_1
> pg_toast_11822 | pg_toast_temp_1
> pg_toast_11822_index | pg_toast_temp_1
> pg_toast_11827 | pg_toast_temp_1
> pg_toast_11827_index | pg_toast_temp_1
> tmp_pg_description | pg_temp_1
> tmp_pg_shdescription | pg_temp_1
> tmp_pg_collation | pg_temp_1
> (10 rows)
>
> These seem to be leftovers of activities of initdb.c's setup_description()
> and setup_collaction().
I noticed these leftovers are not present in template1.
Thanks,
Amit
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rushabh Lathia | 2016-01-06 09:58:29 | Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2016-01-06 09:24:01 | Re: Proposal: SET ROLE hook |