Re: Failing to known state

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: oleg yusim <olegyusim(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Failing to known state
Date: 2016-01-05 23:14:34
Message-ID: 568C4E5A.6040708@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 01/05/2016 03:09 PM, oleg yusim wrote:

>
>
> The question here, what is PostreSQL 9.4.5 (hosted on Linux box)
> behavior? Does it fail to known/secure state in these 3 cases? I tried
> to find the description of the way PostgreSQL fails in this regard, but
> didn't find much.
>

Based on what you pasted, PostgreSQL does fail to a known state. That is
the whole point of the xlog.

Sincerely,

JD

> Thanks,
>
> Oleg

--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Announcing "I'm offended" is basically telling the world you can't
control your own emotions, so everyone else should do it for you.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message oleg yusim 2016-01-05 23:21:40 Re: Failing to known state
Previous Message oleg yusim 2016-01-05 23:09:41 Failing to known state