Re: Improved tab completion for FDW DDL

From: Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Improved tab completion for FDW DDL
Date: 2016-01-04 16:36:02
Message-ID: 568A9F72.60206@proxel.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 01/04/2016 07:26 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> You may want to use Matches() instead of TailMatches() for performance reasons.

Probably, but if so should we not also change the surrounding rules to
also use Matches()? I imitated the surrounding code to keep code
consistency and avoid errors.

I thought I saw some patch from you changing many of the rules from
TailMatches() to Matches(). Perhaps I should just update my patch after
your patch has been applied.

Andreas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-01-04 16:42:36 Re: Improved tab completion for FDW DDL
Previous Message Christoph Berg 2016-01-04 16:33:43 Re: Building pg_xlogdump reproducibly