Re: BUG #17077: about three parameters in postgresql 13.3

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "leiyanliang(at)highgo(dot)com" <leiyanliang(at)highgo(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #17077: about three parameters in postgresql 13.3
Date: 2021-07-17 14:20:24
Message-ID: 56876.1626531624@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

"leiyanliang(at)highgo(dot)com" <leiyanliang(at)highgo(dot)com> writes:
> I want to know: this bug report is a problem or not ?

The code is operating as designed. It does seem odd that there's no
mention of these variables in the documentation, though.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2021-07-17 14:28:09 Re: BUG #17103: WAL segments are not removed after exceeding max_slot_wal_keep_size
Previous Message leiyanliang@highgo.com 2021-07-17 04:40:25 Re: BUG #17077: about three parameters in postgresql 13.3