Re: pg_controldata/pg_resetxlog "Latest checkpoint's NextXID" format

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, José Luis Tallón <jltallon(at)adv-solutions(dot)net>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_controldata/pg_resetxlog "Latest checkpoint's NextXID" format
Date: 2015-12-30 00:17:22
Message-ID: 56832292.2070403@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/29/2015 07:15 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah. Use of the same x/y notation with two different bases seems like
> a recipe for confusion. It's probably too late to do anything about
> this for 9.5, but I'd be +1 for adopting Jose's suggestion or some
> other formatting tweak in HEAD.

I made the "%u/%u" -> "%u:%u" change in the controldata patch I just
posted, but I suppose I should commit that separately. Any complaints
about that?

Joe

--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Haribabu Kommi 2015-12-30 00:28:24 Re: Multi-tenancy with RLS
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2015-12-30 00:14:23 Re: Making tab-complete.c easier to maintain