From: | Boriss Mejias <bmejias(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Testing Postgresql 9.5 RC1 with Alfresco 5.0.d |
Date: | 2015-12-29 16:13:52 |
Message-ID: | 5682B140.2000704@dcc.uchile.cl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs wrote on 29/12/15 05:31:
[...]
> Thanks for testing.
>
> Do you have any comments on performance testing?
Not really, because I didn't have an equivalent environment to compare. These
tests took exactly the same time as another one with Postgresql 9.3, with a
major different in the setting of the server:
Postgresql 9.5 RC1
1 GB of RAM
1 vCPU Intel
CentOS 6.5
vs
Postgresql 9.3
8 GB of RAM
4 vCPU LPAR
Redhat 6.5 PowerLinux
So, I can't really compare. So, definitely no performance degradation, and
possible a performance gain. But of course, this could all be the fault of Alfresco.
Discussing with the Alfresco community I found a benchmarking test which I'm not
familiar with. I'll make sure to include that test next time I test a
pre-release version of Postgresql, and I'll make sure to have equivalent
environment to test.
> Are there any opportunities to improve Alfresco using the new features in
> PostgreSQL 9.5?
I'm not an Alfresco developer, but I'll try to contact the Alfresco engineers to
discuss this.
> Thanks
You're welcome and I hope next tests will include some performance measurements
a part from just compliance tests.
Cheers
Boriss
>
> --
> Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ <http://www.2ndquadrant.com/>
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-12-29 16:21:49 | Re: Making tab-complete.c easier to maintain |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-12-29 16:07:26 | Better detail logging for password auth failures |