| From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: oldest/newestCommitTs output by pg_controldata |
| Date: | 2015-12-28 20:36:40 |
| Message-ID: | 56819D58.2040607@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/28/2015 11:48 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
>> I retract my earlier suggestion of doing HEAD different from
>> REL9_5_STABLE, at least for the moment. My patch for pg_controldata
>> related functions is going to impact all this anyway, so we might as
>> well not fuss about it now.
>
> Seems reasonable.
>
>> Any objections to the attached?
>
> Looks OK in a quick once-over.
Pushed to HEAD and 9.5
Joe
--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Shay Rojansky | 2015-12-28 20:49:53 | Some 9.5beta2 backend processes not terminating properly? |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2015-12-28 20:07:20 | Re: pam auth - add rhost item |