| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes |
| Date: | 2024-05-24 03:11:10 |
| Message-ID: | 568104.1716520270@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 02:27:07PM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
>> I also don't agree these should be left to "Source code" section. I
>> feel that section is best suited for extension authors who might care
>> about some internal API change. I'm talking of stuff that makes some
>> user queries possibly N times (!) faster. Surely "Source Code" isn't
>> the place to talk about that?
> I said a new section "after our 'Source code' section," not in the
> source code section.
Surely, if we make this a separate section, it would come before
'Source code'?
I am not sure Bruce that you realize that your disregard for
performance improvements is shared by nobody. Arguably,
performance is 90% of what we do these days, and it's also
90% of what users care about.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tender Wang | 2024-05-24 03:13:45 | Re: struct RelOptInfo member relid comments |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2024-05-24 03:04:43 | Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes |