Re: [HACKERS] Docs for archive_cleanup_command are poor

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Docs for archive_cleanup_command are poor
Date: 2010-10-14 22:05:48
Message-ID: 5681.1287093948@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Agreed that there are no doc bugs. The reason I suggested a backpatch
> is that I'm concerned that a lot of people are going to be approaching
> the whole Standby topic for the first time with 9.0, so it would be
> nice to give those folks an accessible account of how
> archive_cleanup_command is meant to be used.

Yeah, if this is a material improvement in the usefulness of the HS
docs, I think including it into 9.0.x isn't a bad idea.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-10-14 22:07:43 Re: Documenting removal of nonnullvalue() and friends
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-10-14 19:09:45 Re: Documenting removal of nonnullvalue() and friends

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2010-10-14 22:07:26 Re: Extensions, this time with a patch
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-10-14 22:02:23 Re: SQL command to edit postgresql.conf, with comments