| From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andreas Kretschmer <andreas(at)a-kretschmer(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, susan(dot)hurst(at)brookhurstdata(dot)com, Melvin Davidson <melvin6925(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Calling function (table_name, schema_name) within event trigger |
| Date: | 2015-12-27 20:36:40 |
| Message-ID: | 56804BD8.9040406@aklaver.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 12/27/2015 12:14 PM, Andreas Kretschmer wrote:
>
>> 9.4 did not offer very complete facilities for finding out what the
>> DDL command had done; 9.5 will provide more info.)
>>
>> regards, tom lane
>
> Really?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/plpgsql-trigger.html still contains
> only TG_EVENT and TG_TAG for Triggers on Events (40.9.2). If 9.5 contains more
> information than should someone fix the doku.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/functions-event-triggers.html
>
> Regards, Andreas
>
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Wells Oliver | 2015-12-27 21:39:58 | Options for complex materialized views sharing most of the same logic? |
| Previous Message | Susan Hurst | 2015-12-27 20:32:56 | Re: Calling function (table_name, schema_name) within event trigger |