From: | Gilles Darold <gilles(at)darold(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH][DOC] Fix for PREPARE TRANSACTION doc and postgres_fdw message. |
Date: | 2019-11-05 11:41:41 |
Message-ID: | 5678ccd7-9ea9-00f5-d5fb-04fb8224794d@darold.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Esturo,
Le 05/11/2019 à 10:35, Etsuro Fujita a écrit :
> Hi Gilles,
>
> On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 1:29 AM Gilles Darold <gilles(at)darold(dot)net> wrote:
>> As per the following code, t1 is a remote table through postgres_fdw:
>> test=# BEGIN;
>> BEGIN
>> test=# SELECT * FROM t1;
>> ...
>>
>> test=# PREPARE TRANSACTION 'gxid1';
>> ERROR: cannot prepare a transaction that modified remote tables
>> I have attached a patch to the documentation that adds remote tables to the list of objects where any operation prevent using a prepared transaction, currently it is just notified "operations involving temporary tables or the session's temporary namespace".
> I'm not sure that's a good idea because file_fdw works well for
> PREPARE TRANSACTION! How about adding a note about that to the
> section of Transaction Management in the postgres_fdw documentation
> like the attached?
You are right, read only FDW can be used. A second point in favor of
your remark is that this is the responsibility of the FDW implementation
to throw an error when used with a prepared transaction and I see that
this is not the case for all FDW.
I have attached a single patch that include Etsuro Fujita's patch on
postgres_fdw documentation and mine on postgres_fdw error message with
the precision that it comes from postgres_fdw. The modification about
prepared transaction in PostgreSQL documentation has been removed.
--
Gilles Darold
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
fix_postgres_fdw_prepared_transaction-v3.diff | text/x-patch | 1.1 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Yuya Watari | 2019-11-05 11:43:38 | Re: Keep compiler silence (clang 10, implicit conversion from 'long' to 'double' ) |
Previous Message | Ashutosh Sharma | 2019-11-05 11:18:12 | Re: tableam vs. TOAST |