"David G. Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 7:45 PM Curt Kolovson <ckolovson(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I’d vote for showing both (with RETURNING and without), since without it
>> the second argument to SPI_exec has no effect in this example, which may
>> not be obvious. That seems to be one of the subtle points illustrated by
>> this example.
> I concur:
Agreed. Done at 137b131d6.
regards, tom lane